Name: Sacrifice and Atonement: Psychological Motives and Biblical Patterns (en Inglés)
Price: 1036.62 MXN
Availability: InStock
Author: Finlan, Stephen
ISBN: 9781506401966

Envío gratis

portada Sacrifice and Atonement: Psychological Motives and Biblical Patterns (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Stephen Finlan

Editorial

Fortress Press

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

224

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 1.8 cm

Peso

0.41 kg.

ISBN13

9781506401966

Categorías

Textos judaicos | tanaj, torá, neblim, ketuvim
El antiguo testamento
Crítica y exégesis de textos sagrados
Teología

Sacrifice and Atonement: Psychological Motives and Biblical Patterns (en Inglés)

Stephen Finlan (Autor) · Fortress Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Físico

$ 1,036.62

$ 1,884.76

Ahorras: $ 848.14

45% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 31 de Mayo y el Jueves 13 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de México entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Sacrifice and Atonement: Psychological Motives and Biblical Patterns (en Inglés)"

Beneath the commonplace affirmation that Jesus paid for our sins lie depths of implication: Did God demand a blood sacrifice to assuage divine anger? Is sacrifice (consciously or unconsciously) intended to induce the deity to show favor? What underlies the various metaphors for atonement used in the Bible?Here, Stephen Finlan surveys psychological theories that help us to understand beliefs about sacrifice and atonement and what they may reveal about patterns of injury, guilt, shame, and appeasement. Early chapters examine the language in both testaments of purity and the scapegoat, and of payment, obligation, reciprocity, and redemption. Later chapters review theories of the origins of atonement thinking in fear and traumatic childhood experience, in ambivalent or avoidant attachment to the parents, and in poisonous pedagogy. The theories of Sandor Rado, Mary Ainsworth, Erik Erikson, and Alice Miller are examined, then Finlan draws conclusions about the moral responsibility of appropriating or rejecting atonement metaphors. His arguments bear careful consideration by all who live with these metaphors and their effects today.