Name: My Way or the Court's way?: A Critical Analysis of the extent to which the UK Courts take incapacitated patients' wishes into consideration (en Inglés)
Price: 935.36 MXN
Availability: InStock
Author: Vincenzotti, Sara
ISBN: 9783346206138

Envío gratis

portada My Way or the Court's way?: A Critical Analysis of the extent to which the UK Courts take incapacitated patients' wishes into consideration (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Sara Vincenzotti

Editorial

Grin Verlag

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

21.6 x 14.0 x 0.1 cm

Peso

0.04 kg.

ISBN13

9783346206138

Categorías

Teoría del derecho

My Way or the Court's way?: A Critical Analysis of the extent to which the UK Courts take incapacitated patients' wishes into consideration (en Inglés)

Sara Vincenzotti (Autor) · Grin Verlag · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 935.36

$ 1,700.66

Ahorras: $ 765.30

45% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 05 de Agosto y el Viernes 16 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de México entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "My Way or the Court's way?: A Critical Analysis of the extent to which the UK Courts take incapacitated patients' wishes into consideration (en Inglés)"

Essay from the year 2020 in the subject Law - Miscellaneous, grade: 68.00, University of Manchester, course: LLM Healthcare Ethics and the Law, language: English, abstract: A patients' role was historically recognised as being considerably limited, arguably nonexistent, in determining what was considered to be their best interests. This essay will engage in a critical analysis of judge-made law relating to the extent of incapacitated patient participation in the assessment of their best interests. In an effort to do so, it will start by assessing the noteworthy judgements which have developed the extent in which an incapacitated patient's wishes, feelings and views may be taken into account. This evaluation will prove the dynamic shift in societal opinion and medical practice, which developed a paternalistic 'doctor knows best approach' of bests interests to a patient centered one instead. Following this, I will engage in a critical case analysis of Peter Jackson J's antagonistic judgements in A Local Authority v E and the later decision of Wye Valley. This comparison will be used to show how the extent to which the courts have taken into account an incapacitated patient's wishes has conclusively expanded over time. Finally, I will conclude by analysing what the relevant advantages and disadvantages are of incorporating a patient's wishes into the best interests test assessment.