Compartir
is belief in god good, bad or irrelevant?,a professor and a punk rocker discuss science, religion, naturalism & christianity (en Inglés)
Preston Jones
(Ilustrado por)
·
IVP
· Tapa Blanda
is belief in god good, bad or irrelevant?,a professor and a punk rocker discuss science, religion, naturalism & christianity (en Inglés) - Jones, Preston
$ 413.22
$ 688.69
Ahorras: $ 275.48
Elige la lista en la que quieres agregar tu producto o crea una nueva lista
✓ Producto agregado correctamente a la lista de deseos.
Ir a Mis Listas
Origen: Reino Unido
(Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)
Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el
Lunes 20 de Mayo y el
Martes 28 de Mayo.
Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de México entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.
Reseña del libro "is belief in god good, bad or irrelevant?,a professor and a punk rocker discuss science, religion, naturalism & christianity (en Inglés)"
Greg Graffin is frontman, singer and songwriter for the punk band Bad Religion. He also happens to have a Ph.D. in zoology and wrote his dissertation on evolution, atheism and naturalism. Preston Jones is a history professor at a Christian college and a fan of Bad Religion's music. One day, on a whim, Preston sent Greg an appreciative e-mail. That was the start of an extraordinary correspondence. For several months, Preston and Greg sent e-mails back and forth on big topics like God, religion, knowledge, evil, evolution, biology, destiny and the nature of reality. Preston believes in God; Greg sees insufficient evidence for God's existence. Over the course of their friendly debate, they tackle such cosmic questions as: Is religion rational or irrational? Does morality require belief in God? Do people only believe in God because they are genetically predisposed toward religion? How do you make sense of suffering in the world? Is this universe all there is? And what does it all matter? In this engaging book, Preston and Greg's actual e-mail correspondence is reproduced, along with bonus materials that provide additional background and context. Each makes his case for why he thinks his worldview is more compelling and explanatory. While they find some places to agree, neither one convinces the other. They can't both be right. So which worldview is more plausible? You decide.
