Name: Anti-Americanism and the Limits of Public Diplomacy: Winning Hearts and Minds? (Routledge Studies in us Foreign Policy) (en Inglés)
Price: 2787.68 MXN
Availability: InStock
Author: Stephen Brooks
ISBN: 9781138949218

Envío gratis

portada Anti-Americanism and the Limits of Public Diplomacy: Winning Hearts and Minds? (Routledge Studies in us Foreign Policy) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Routledge

Autor

Stephen Brooks

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

168

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9781138949218

N° edición

Anti-Americanism and the Limits of Public Diplomacy: Winning Hearts and Minds? (Routledge Studies in us Foreign Policy) (en Inglés)

Stephen Brooks (Autor) · Routledge · Tapa Dura

Libro Físico

$ 2,787.68

$ 5,575.36

Ahorras: $ 2,787.68

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Reino Unido (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Miércoles 26 de Junio y el Lunes 08 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de México entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Anti-Americanism and the Limits of Public Diplomacy: Winning Hearts and Minds? (Routledge Studies in us Foreign Policy) (en Inglés)"

Contrary to the view held by many who study American foreign policy, public diplomacy has seldom played a decisive role in the achievement of the country's foreign policy objectives. The reasons for this are not that the policies and interventions are ill-conceived or badly executed, although this is sometimes the case. Rather, the factors that limit the effectiveness of public diplomacy lie almost entirely outside the control of American policy-makers. In particular, the resistance of foreign opinion-leaders to ideas and information about American motives and actions that do not square with their pre-conceived notions of the United States and its activities in the world is an enormous and perhaps insurmountable wall that limits the impact of public diplomacy. This book does not conclude that public diplomacy has no place in the repertoire of American foreign policy. Instead, the expectations held for this soft power tool need to be more realistic. Public diplomacy should not be viewed as a substitute for hard power tools that are more likely to be correlated with actual American influence as opposed to the somewhat nebulous concept of American standing.