Name: An Analysis of Douglas McGregor's the Human Side of Enterprise (en Inglés)
Price: 491.27 MXN
Availability: InStock
Author: Stoyanov, Stoyan ; Diderich, Monique
ISBN: 9781912302178

Envío gratis

portada An Analysis of Douglas McGregor's the Human Side of Enterprise (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Monique Diderich

Stoyan Stoyanov

Editorial

Macat Library

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

Dimensiones

20.3 x 13.5 x 1.0 cm

Peso

0.23 kg.

ISBN13

9781912302178

N° edición

Categorías

Historia y crítica literaria
Gestión empresarial

An Analysis of Douglas McGregor's the Human Side of Enterprise (en Inglés)

Monique Diderich (Autor) · Stoyan Stoyanov (Autor) · Macat Library · Tapa Dura

Libro Físico

$ 491.27

$ 982.53

Ahorras: $ 491.27

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Reino Unido (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Martes 25 de Junio y el Viernes 05 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de México entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "An Analysis of Douglas McGregor's the Human Side of Enterprise (en Inglés)"

What makes a good manager? Though we can probably all point to someone we think of as a good manager, what precisely makes them so good at their job is a complex question - and one central to good business organization. Management scholar Douglas McGregor's seminal 1960 book The Human Side of Enterprise is perhaps the most influential attempt to answer that question, and provides an excellent example of strong evaluative and reasoning skills in action. Evaluation is all about judging the strength and weakness of positions: a critical evaluation asks how acceptable a line of reasoning is, how adequate, relevant and convincing the evidence is. McGregor sought to find out what makes a good manager by evaluating different management approaches, their assumptions about human behavior, and effects they had. In his view, management approaches could be roughly broken down into two "theories" Theory X, which held a negative idea of employee motivations; and Theory Y, which made positive assumptions about them. In McGregor's evaluation, Theory Y produced markedly better results in productivity and other measurable areas. On this basis, McGregor reasoned out a strong, persuasive argument for adopting Theory Y strategies on a grand scale.