Name: The Dreadful Symmetry of the Good: A Sustained Meditation, in and by Writing, on the Good Grounded in the Author's Deciphering of Plato's Final Teac (en Inglés)
SKU: 3807885
Price: 555.55 MXN
Availability: InStock
Author: John W. Mcginley
ISBN: 9781440165405

portada The Dreadful Symmetry of the Good: A Sustained Meditation, in and by Writing, on the Good Grounded in the Author's Deciphering of Plato's Final Teac (en Inglés)

The Dreadful Symmetry of the Good: A Sustained Meditation, in and by Writing, on the Good Grounded in the Author's Deciphering of Plato's Final Teac (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Iuniverse

Autor

John W. Mcginley

Año

2009

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

576

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN

1440165408

ISBN13

9781440165405

Categorías

Filosofía antigua griega y romana

The Dreadful Symmetry of the Good: A Sustained Meditation, in and by Writing, on the Good Grounded in the Author's Deciphering of Plato's Final Teac (en Inglés)

John W. Mcginley (Autor) · Iuniverse · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 17 a 22 días háb.

$ 1,234.55$ 555.55

-55%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 100 unidades

$ 555.55

¡Envío Gratis! Llega entre el 29 Sep y el 07 Oct a CUAUHTÉMOC, Ciudad de México. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "The Dreadful Symmetry of the Good: A Sustained Meditation, in and by Writing, on the Good Grounded in the Author's Deciphering of Plato's Final Teac (en Inglés)"

Yes, that's right. The writings of Plato do NOT all fit together in harmony, irrespective of the question of chronological development. To be sure, one is just ice-skating over the surface of Platonic writings if one does not have a nuanced understanding of the various periods of Plato's intellectual development over time. The incongruity in his writings which is a function of this multi-faceted intellectual development over time can, however, be sufficiently delineated. But there is another kind of incongruity which, especially in Plato's case, could never be and in fact never was explainable through a nuanced accounting of Plato's long and ever-revising intellectual development. The writings of Plato could never have been anything other than incongruous in this more fundamental sense, Plato being Plato. For Plato being Plato, early and or middle and or later, IS precisely this: Plato contra Plato. But more than that, "the good itself" [[i.e., Plato's eventual teaching on the good