Name: Rhetoric and Discourse in Supreme Court Oral Arguments: Sensemaking in Judicial Decisions (en Inglés)
SKU: 56029256
Price: 1489.71 MXN
Availability: InStock
Author: Malphurs Ryan
ISBN: 9781138842489

portada Rhetoric and Discourse in Supreme Court Oral Arguments: Sensemaking in Judicial Decisions (en Inglés)

Rhetoric and Discourse in Supreme Court Oral Arguments: Sensemaking in Judicial Decisions (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Routledge

Autor

Malphurs Ryan

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

248

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781138842489

N° edición

Rhetoric and Discourse in Supreme Court Oral Arguments: Sensemaking in Judicial Decisions (en Inglés)

Malphurs Ryan (Autor) · Routledge · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 22 a 27 días háb.

$ 2,482.85$ 1,489.71

-40%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

$ 1,489.71

¡Envío Gratis! Llega entre el 08 Oct y el 16 Oct a CUAUHTÉMOC, Ciudad de México. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Rhetoric and Discourse in Supreme Court Oral Arguments: Sensemaking in Judicial Decisions (en Inglés)"

While legal scholars, psychologists, and political scientists commonly voice their skepticism over the influence oral arguments have on the Court's voting pattern, this book offers a contrarian position focused on close scrutiny of the justices' communication within oral arguments. Malphurs examines the rhetoric, discourse, and subsequent decision-making within the oral arguments for significant Supreme Court cases, visiting their potential power and danger and revealing the rich dynamic nature of the justices' interactions among themselves and the advocates. In addition to offering advancements in scholars' understanding of oral arguments, this study introduces Sensemaking as an alternative to rational decision-making in Supreme Court arguments, suggesting a new model of judicial decision-making to account for the communication within oral arguments that underscores a glaring irony surrounding the bulk of related research-the willingness of scholars to criticize oral arguments but their unwillingness to study this communication. With the growing accessibility of the Court's oral arguments and the inevitable introduction of television cameras in the courtroom, this book offers new theoretical and methodological perspectives at a time when scholars across the fields of communication, law, psychology, and political science will direct even greater attention and scrutiny toward the Supreme Court.