Name: Resolving Disagreements: A Semantic and Epistemological Inquiry (en Inglés)
SKU: 57730727
Price: 2194.78 MXN
Availability: InStock
Author: Wahlberg, Åke
ISBN: 9783031504105

portada Resolving Disagreements: A Semantic and Epistemological Inquiry (en Inglés)

Resolving Disagreements: A Semantic and Epistemological Inquiry (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Åke Wahlberg

Editorial

Palgrave MacMillan

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

211

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

Dimensiones

21x14.8x1.4 cm

Peso

0.42 kg.

ISBN13

9783031504105

Categorías

Filosofía: epistemología y teoría del conocimiento
Filosofía de la religión

Resolving Disagreements: A Semantic and Epistemological Inquiry (en Inglés)

Åke Wahlberg (Autor) · Palgrave MacMillan · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 13 a 18 días háb.

$ 3,657.97$ 2,194.78

-40%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

$ 2,194.78

¡Envío Gratis! Llega entre el 18 Sep y el 28 Sep a CUAUHTÉMOC, Ciudad de México. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Resolving Disagreements: A Semantic and Epistemological Inquiry (en Inglés)"

This book examines how the semantics and metaphysics of disagreement affect the epistemology of disagreement. It thus broadens the philosophical discourse by relating the epistemological discussion of (peer) disagreement to inquiries into the nature of disagreement and disagreeing. By doing this, it paints a new picture of the epistemological situation evoked by disagreement: To the same extent that an interpersonal dispute undermines the justification of the disputing persons' beliefs, it also presents an obstacle to interpersonal understanding. This follows from the nature of meaning, belief and communication, rightly understood. In demonstrating the relevance of this to philosophical reflections on peer disagreement and resolution of disagreement, the book addresses arguably the most contentious kind of disagreement, namely, religious disagreement. It shows that apparent disagreement in religion suggests that the dialog partners might not have reached sufficient mutual understanding. This has important ramifications for the rationally right conduct in the face of religious disagreement, and for the possibility of rational resolution of religious disputes.