Name: Judicial Discretion and Criminal Litigation (en Inglés)
SKU: 18972942
Price: 4278.26 MXN
Availability: InStock
Author: Rosemary Pattenden
ISBN: 9780198255673

portada Judicial Discretion and Criminal Litigation (en Inglés)

Judicial Discretion and Criminal Litigation (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Oxford University Press

Autor

Rosemary Pattenden

Año

1990

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

496

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN

0198255675

ISBN13

9780198255673

N° edición

Categorías

Lingüística

Judicial Discretion and Criminal Litigation (en Inglés)

Rosemary Pattenden (Autor) · Oxford University Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 14 a 19 días háb.

$ 7,130.43$ 4,278.26

-40%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

$ 4,278.26

¡Envío Gratis! Llega entre el 28 Sep y el 06 Oct a CUAUHTÉMOC, Ciudad de México. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Judicial Discretion and Criminal Litigation (en Inglés)"

This book is about the discretions exercised by criminal trial courts both at Crown Court and Magistrates' Court level and about discretion in the criminal appellate process. The aim is twofold. First, to provide a theoretical framework within which to discuss and assess the discretions. This entails defining discretion, outlining the reasons for the existence of discretion and considering the means by which discretion may be controlled. Secondly, to examine the evidential and procedural discretions whose existence is recorded in cases, statutes, and the reports of law bodies, and to list the known principles by which these discretions should be exercised. The text concentrates on the law and practice in England and Wales but the footnotes include extensive references to the decisions and statutes of Australia, Canada and New Zealand. The last chapter of the book examines the way in which an exercise of discretion by a trial court, the Court of Appeal, or the Divisional Court of the Queen's Bench Division may be challenged and demonstrates that whatever the position may have been at the turn of the century few erroneous exercises of discretion are now inviolable.