Miles de libros con descuento a un solo clic en Buscalibre.com  Ver más

Enviar a
CUAUHTÉMOC, Ciudad de México
0
  • argentina
  • chile
  • colombia
  • españa
  • méxico
  • perú
  • estados unidos
  • internacional

Selecciona tu país

América

Europa

Resto del mundo

portada Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: A Comparison of Quantitative Approaches (en Inglés)
Formato
Libro Físico
Editorial
Idioma
Inglés
N° páginas
44
Encuadernación
Tapa Blanda
Dimensiones
28.0 x 21.6 x 0.2 cm
Peso
0.13 kg.
ISBN13
9781495302749

Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: A Comparison of Quantitative Approaches (en Inglés)

U. S. Department of Heal Human Services (Autor) · Agency for Healthcare Resea And Quality (Autor) · Createspace · Tapa Blanda

Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: A Comparison of Quantitative Approaches (en Inglés) - And Quality, Agency for Healthcare Resea ; Human Services, U. S. Department of Heal

Libro Nuevo Importado
Envío: 17 a 22 días háb.
$ 847.39$ 423.69
-50%
Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅
Libro Nuevo

Quedan 100 unidades

$ 423.69
Llega entre el 14 Jul y el 22 Jul a CUAUHTÉMOC, Ciudad de México. Seleccionar ubicación

Reseña del libro "Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: A Comparison of Quantitative Approaches (en Inglés)"

Systematic reviews often assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of health care interventions. To be most useful to users, systematic reviews should include estimates of the potential benefits and harms that are important to decisionmakers. Quantitative approaches for the assessment of benefits and harms may enhance, support, and facilitate how decisionmakers use systematic reviews. Previously, we prepared a report on the challenges and principles of assessing benefits and harms of medical interventions, the influence of values and preference, and the key characteristics of quantitative approaches to benefit and harm assessment. That report identified 16 quantitative approaches for assessing benefits and harms. Researchers and methodologists developed several of these approaches using data from a single study, but these approaches could be used in systematic reviews. Reviewers from the Cochrane Collaboration have routinely used simpler approaches, such as the number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH). Decisionmaking contexts that have a larger number of relevant benefit and harm outcomes may need more complex approaches. However, we have limited understanding of the comparative strengths and limitations of quantitative approaches to benefit and harm assessment because little work has been done to compare empirical applications of these approaches. The specific objectives of this report were: - To illustrate two quantitative approaches to benefit and harm assessment in the context of a systematic review; and - To evaluate the methodological challenges of applying the two quantitative approaches to benefit and harm assessment in a systematic review.

Opiniones del libro

Preguntas frecuentes sobre el libro

Todos los libros de nuestro catálogo son Originales.
El libro está escrito en Inglés.
La encuadernación de esta edición es Tapa Blanda.

Preguntas y respuestas sobre el libro

¿Tienes una pregunta sobre el libro? Inicia sesión para poder agregar tu propia pregunta.

Opiniones sobre Buscalibre

Ver más opiniones de clientes