Name: Conjugal love in Hispanic canonistics (en Inglés)
SKU: 59302449
Price: 1400.71 MXN
Availability: InStock
Author: Rivadeneira Martínez, Carlos Alberto
ISBN: 9786206625827

portada Conjugal love in Hispanic canonistics (en Inglés)

Conjugal love in Hispanic canonistics (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Carlos Alberto Rivadeneira Martínez

Editorial

Our Knowledge Publishing

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

108

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9x15.2x0.7 cm

Peso

0.17 kg.

ISBN13

9786206625827

Categorías

Derecho de familia

Conjugal love in Hispanic canonistics (en Inglés)

Carlos Alberto Rivadeneira Martínez (Autor) · Our Knowledge Publishing · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 22 a 27 días háb.

$ 2,334.52$ 1,400.71

-40%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 10 unidades

$ 1,400.71

¡Envío Gratis! Llega entre el 06 Oct y el 14 Oct a CUAUHTÉMOC, Ciudad de México. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Conjugal love in Hispanic canonistics (en Inglés)"

Conjugal love, which is the greatest of friendships according to St. Thomas Aquinas, is the love of benevolence, the love of agape, where the good of my spouse interests me as much as my own good, it is a personal and total donation, exclusive, excluding, irrevocable, it is an element of the essence of matrimonial consent, it is identified with it, it is also its object. Without conjugal love, which is not mere infatuation but an act of will, there is no true marital consent. For can anyone want to celebrate the partnership of a lifetime, the community of life and love that is marriage, with its demands of fidelity, indissolubility, self-giving and total self-giving, if he or she does not love that person? I think that one cannot consent to marriage without love. And since consent is the efficient cause of marriage, without love there is no marriage because there is no consent. Marriage is not born either as a sacrament or as a contract. In this book different canonical doctrinal and jurisprudential positions are presented, in favor of considering marriage as an essential element of consent, or denying it juridical relevance because love is considered a metajuridical element.