Compartir
The Podium, the Pulpit, and the Republicans: How Presidential Candidates Use Religious Language in American Political Debate (en Inglés)
Frederick Stecker
(Autor)
·
Praeger
· Tapa Blanda
The Podium, the Pulpit, and the Republicans: How Presidential Candidates Use Religious Language in American Political Debate (en Inglés) - Stecker, Frederick ; Lemert, Charles C.
$ 1,347.47
$ 2,245.78
Ahorras: $ 898.31
Elige la lista en la que quieres agregar tu producto o crea una nueva lista
✓ Producto agregado correctamente a la lista de deseos.
Ir a Mis Listas
Origen: Estados Unidos
(Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)
Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el
Miércoles 29 de Mayo y el
Martes 11 de Junio.
Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de México entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.
Reseña del libro "The Podium, the Pulpit, and the Republicans: How Presidential Candidates Use Religious Language in American Political Debate (en Inglés)"
In this book, the presidential debates of 2000, 2004, and 2008 are analyzed in terms of linguistics, rhetoric, and religious context to offer a unique perspective on the styles, beliefs, and strategies of the two major parties and their candidates. In The Podium, the Pulpit, and the Republicans: How Presidential Candidates Use Religious Language in American Political Debate, a veteran minister analyzes the religious metaphors Republicans use at the podium and alleges that the party deliberately employs blaming tactics, fear metaphors, and coded references to apocalyptic judgment to sway undecided voters. Over the past 40 years, Frederick Stecker charges, the Republican Party has created fear for political expediency. Stecker's book traces the development of the Republican rhetoric of polarization and applies the linguistics-based "nation-as-a-family" political typology of George Lakoff to an analysis of the presidential debates of 2000, 2004, and 2008. He demonstrates how Republican candidates select their language and metaphors to signal adherence to rigid belief systems and simple, black-and-white choices in domestic and foreign policy.
